The literary works “Theology” by
Paul Lawrence Dunbar, “Tableau” by Countee Cullen and Frankenstein by
Mary Shelly all say something about personal reflection and responsibility. As
humans we are required to accept each other no matter what. However through
history and personal experience it is more often than not that humans are
reluctant to accept others. In “Theology”, the speaker mocks those around him
and believes that he is better off alone. In “Tableau” the boy and girl hold
hands, showing that race shouldn’t be a barrier. Lastly In Frankenstein,
the protagonist Victor Frankenstein shuns the monster because of his
appearance. As usual this weeks Zen
Mediation provided a relief for me, as it forced me to just sit quietly and
reflect on the past week. The works and my meditation experience all forced me
show how acceptance is important.
Paul Lawrence Dunbar uses
“Theology” to show human nature and its different sides. Although the poem is
short, it carries a deep message about how we should interact with others. The
speaker uses the ideas of heaven and hell to describe the two types of people
in the world. Although the poem could be eye opening and a lesson the speaker
uses it as a way to insult those around him. Dunbar writes, “There is a hell,
I'm quite as sure; for pray If there were not, where would my neighbors
go?” clearly showing the speakers disapproval of his neighbors. I feel that
Dunbar is being ironic because although the speaker believes he will go to
heaven his abhorrence of others is what might cause him to go to hell.
On the
other hand writer Countee Cullen uses her poem “Tableau” as a symbol of
acceptance. The beginning of the poem
immediately shows the characters disregard for what is socially accepted but
their bravery to stand up for what is right. Cullen portrays that although
being accepting can be difficult it is often necessary to fight against
oppression. The line, “Indignant that these two should dare In unison
to walk.” shows that although the characters are being judged by those
around them the do not wavier from accepting each other.
Likewise Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein uses the main characters to
show disapproval of others just leads to violence and danger. In the novel Victor
Frankenstein creates a monster and later disregards him because he is ugly.
Through the first half of the novel we learn that the monster is actually a
gentle kind person, but because of his looks is misjudged and never accepted. Although
we do not know the ending of the novel it is safe to assume that Victor’s lack
of acceptance will cause the monster lash out against other human beings.
Zen
mediation is definitely very different from American culture. The past few weeks
of meditation have shown me that it is imperative to accept different cultures
and embrace what they have to offer. The
authors of these works use their characters to show the importance of acceptance
and personal reflection.
No comments:
Post a Comment